In today’s world of “Big Data”, it seems hard to believe that less than one third of all births and over two thirds of all deaths are still not recorded around the world. For all intents and purposes, births and deaths that are not recorded don’t count – and that is a big problem. In the words of Nandini Oomman and co-authors put it so eloquently in a recent commentary in the Lancet:

Functioning vital registration systems are global public goods that help with the collection, storage, retrieval, and analysis of accurate population and demographic data to support development policy and monitor health outcomes, particularly for maternal and child health. However, without strong vital registries, individuals do not have legal documentation of their own personhood, citizenship, and all associated rights; national policy makers do not have necessary data for resource allocation and planning; and the international community does not have evidence to monitor development progress against global benchmarks—eg, the Millennium Development Goals.

For far too long the excuse has been a lack of resources, but I really don’t buy this argument. Chris Murray once told me that India had a functioning vital registration system in place up until the 1920s when it was neglected and became non-functional. It seems that collecting data on people, even vitally important data, has been neglected and ignored by national and international policy makers. This study of maternal mortality declines in Sri Lanka – one of my favorite papers, ever – documented cause of deaths in the late 1940s, which was only possible due to the excellent data systems that were in place in that country nearly a century ago.

Last week a big conference on civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems was held in Bangkok. It appears that momentum is building to put such systems into place around the world. But concerted efforts will be needed to be put into place to make this a reality. Donors have a big role to play. As consumers of global health data, it is not unreasonable that they should also be expected to pay for a big part of it, but not in one-off data collection systems as they do now. CGD’s proposal to build data into its cash-on-delivery scheme seems like a good way to go – but there are other good ideas out there. The power of mobile phone technology is also making it easier, more effective, and cheaper to collect data from many locations and this should be further enforced in the context of vital registration systems.

Vital registration systems are vitally important to global health. It is about time that they get the attention they deserve.

Share on Facebook
 

2 Responses to “Vital registration systems are vitally important to global health”

  1. Interesting article. I think some aspect of births not getting registered in contries like India, Sri Lanka might be due to the reason that births would be taking outside organized hospital systems and registering births by Goverment agencies would still be bureacratic.
    Absense of social security identifiers also does not motivate people to register births easily specially in rural and poor homes.

  2. Hi Karen,

    Nice article. Marc Mitchell said we should meet!

    You may enjoy this paper we wrote last year on Registration Systems:
    http://www.rhm-elsevier.com/article/S0968-8080(12)39631-6/abstract

    Regards,
    Alain

Leave a Reply



Analytics Plugin created by Web Hosting